Skip to main content
Whistleblower Protection

Case closure

Case closure is the formal conclusion of processing a report by the reporting channel, including the final assessment, the decision on follow-up measures and informing the whistleblower about the outcome.

Case closure marks the end of the report-handling process under the German Whistleblower Protection Act (Hinweisgeberschutzgesetz, HinSchG). Once the internal or external reporting channel has assessed the validity of the report, conducted an internal investigation where necessary and decided on appropriate follow-up measures, the procedure is formally concluded. Closure involves the final documentation of the facts, the measures taken and the reasons why the procedure was ended - for example because the suspicion could not be substantiated, because remedial measures were initiated, or because the case was referred to a competent authority.

A core element of case closure is the feedback to the whistleblower. Under Section 17 (2) HinSchG the reporting channel must provide feedback within three months of acknowledging receipt - or, if no acknowledgement was sent, within three months and seven days of the report being received. This feedback informs the whistleblower of planned or already implemented follow-up measures and the reasons for them. Provided that internal enquiries or investigations are not jeopardised and the rights of the persons concerned by the report are not affected, the whistleblower is thereby notified of the outcome of the procedure.

Case closure entails further obligations for the reporting channel, in particular proper documentation and retention. Under Section 11 HinSchG the report must be documented in a permanently retrievable manner while observing the confidentiality requirement; the documentation must be deleted three years after the procedure has been concluded, unless longer retention is necessary and proportionate. Even after closure, the prohibition of reprisals under Section 36 HinSchG remains in force, so the whistleblower is permanently protected against detriment. A clean case closure therefore creates legal certainty for everyone involved and is a precondition for a transparent, legally compliant whistleblowing system.

Legal Basis

Section 17 (2) HinSchG (feedback), Section 11 HinSchG (documentation and deletion), Section 18 HinSchG (follow-up measures)

Practical Example

A compliance officer receives a report via the internal reporting channel concerning possible corruption in the awarding of contracts. After acknowledging receipt within seven days, she assesses its plausibility, consults the whistleblower and initiates an internal investigation. This reveals a breach of internal procurement guidelines; as a follow-up measure the processes are adjusted and the employee concerned receives a written warning. Within the three-month deadline she informs the whistleblower that the report led to concrete remedial action, formally closes the procedure and documents the case in an audit-proof manner for the three-year retention period.

FAQ

The reporting channel must provide feedback no later than three months after acknowledging receipt. If no acknowledgement was sent, the deadline expires three months and seven days after the report was received. The feedback covers planned and already implemented follow-up measures and the reasons for them.
Under Section 11 (5) HinSchG the documentation of a report must be deleted three years after the procedure has been concluded. Longer retention is only permitted where it is necessary and proportionate to fulfil legal obligations, for example because of ongoing legal proceedings.
No. The prohibition of reprisals under Section 36 HinSchG continues to apply regardless of the conclusion of the procedure. Whistleblowers who reported in good faith are permanently protected against detriment such as dismissal, written warnings or harassment.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more