Skip to main content
Whistleblower Protection

Oral report

Under the German Whistleblower Protection Act, an oral report is a disclosure made by telephone, through another voice-messaging system, or on request in a physical meeting, which the reporting office must document on a lasting basis.

An oral report is one of the legally mandated channels through which whistleblowers may submit information about breaches under the German Whistleblower Protection Act (HinSchG). It is typically made by telephone or via another voice-messaging system, such as a voicemail box or recorded message attached to the reporting channel. Both internal and external reporting offices must enable reports in oral as well as written form; restricting the channel to a single format is not permitted. The reporting person always retains the right to choose the form in which they approach the reporting office.

The Act imposes specific documentation requirements on oral reports. Where a report is made by telephone or other voice transmission, the reporting office may only create a permanently retrievable audio recording with the consent of the reporting person; without consent, it must instead produce an accurate and complete summary, either a verbatim transcript or a faithful written record of the conversation. The reporting person must be given the opportunity to review this documentation, to correct it where necessary, and to confirm it by signature or in another form. At the request of the reporting person, the oral report must also be discussed in a physical meeting within a reasonable period.

An oral report is subject to the same protective and procedural guarantees as any other protected report: the duty of confidentiality safeguarding the whistleblower's identity, the obligation to acknowledge receipt within seven days, and the feedback on planned and taken follow-up measures within three months. The prohibition of reprisals applies regardless of whether a report was made orally or in writing. For organisations this means that a mere email contact is not sufficient: the reporting channel must be designed in technical and organisational terms so that telephone tips, too, can be received securely, treated confidentially, and documented in compliance with the law.

Legal Basis

Sections 16, 17 and 27 HinSchG; Art. 9 EU Whistleblower Directive (Directive (EU) 2019/1937)

Practical Example

An employee calls the internal reporting office of a mid-sized company to describe a suspicion of billing fraud. The responsible compliance officer first asks whether the caller agrees to an audio recording. As he declines, she takes a complete written record of the substance of the call during the conversation, reads the key points back to the whistleblower, and afterwards sends him the record for review and confirmation. Within seven days she sends an acknowledgement of receipt and logs the matter in the case-management system, so that the three-month feedback deadline is documented in a fully traceable manner.

FAQ

No. A permanently retrievable audio recording is only lawful with the consent of the reporting person. Without consent, the reporting office must instead produce a complete and accurate written record of the conversation. The reporting person must be given the opportunity to review and confirm this documentation.
Yes. Under the HinSchG, internal and external reporting offices must enable reports in both oral and written form. Oral reporting covers telephone tips and, on request, a physical meeting as well. Limiting the service to a single channel is not permitted.
Yes. The duty of confidentiality, acknowledgement of receipt within seven days, feedback within three months, and the prohibition of reprisals all apply regardless of the form of the report. Choosing a particular reporting route must never put the whistleblower at a disadvantage.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more