Skip to main content
Whistleblower Protection

Reporting channel

A reporting channel is the technical and organisational route through which whistleblowers can report breaches – in writing, orally, or, on request, in a personal meeting.

Under the German Whistleblower Protection Act (Hinweisgeberschutzgesetz, HinSchG), a reporting channel is any route through which a whistleblower can submit a report about a breach. The law distinguishes between internal reporting channels, set up by the employer itself, and external reporting channels at the state reporting bodies. The reporting channel is therefore the heart of any whistleblowing system: it determines how reliably, confidentially and accessibly a report can be received in the first place.

Pursuant to Section 16(3) HinSchG, internal reporting channels must allow reports to be made orally or in text form. Oral reports may be made by telephone or by other means of voice transmission; in addition, at the whistleblower's request, a personal meeting must be made possible within a reasonable period. While there is no strict obligation to accept anonymous reports, anonymously submitted reports should nonetheless be processed. In every case, the decisive requirement is that the channel preserve the confidentiality of the whistleblower's identity as well as that of any persons affected by or named in the report.

The reporting channel must be secured technically and organisationally so that only the responsible staff, who are bound to confidentiality, can access incoming reports. In practice, this is achieved through specialised digital whistleblowing platforms, dedicated telephone or mailbox systems, or external ombudspersons. Key features include encrypted transmission, audit-proof documentation, clearly defined access rights, and traceable deadlines for the acknowledgement of receipt (seven days) and feedback (three months). A poorly designed or hard-to-find reporting channel undermines the entire whistleblower protection, because employees will not use it or will not trust it.

Legal Basis

Sections 12, 13, 16, 17 HinSchG; Articles 7–9 of the EU Whistleblowing Directive (Dir. (EU) 2019/1937)

Practical Example

A mid-sized company with 320 employees sets up an internal reporting channel as an encrypted online platform and appoints the head of its legal department as an independent internal reporting office. In addition, a telephone hotline with a voicemail function is provided so that oral reports are also possible. When an employee submits a report about manipulated safety records, she automatically receives an acknowledgement of receipt via the platform within 24 hours; the compliance officer assesses the validity of the report, launches an internal investigation, and provides the whistleblower with feedback on the follow-up measures taken within three months – without disclosing her identity to the manager concerned.

FAQ

Under Section 16(3) HinSchG, the internal reporting channel must allow reports in oral and in text form. Oral reports may be made by telephone or by voice transmission. At the whistleblower's request, a personal meeting must also be made possible within a reasonable period.
There is no express obligation to provide anonymous reporting routes. However, the law stipulates that anonymously submitted reports should also be processed. Many companies therefore voluntarily enable anonymous reporting via digital platforms in order to lower the barrier to reporting and to strengthen trust in the channel.
The reporting channel must be secured technically and organisationally so that only the staff tasked with processing reports, who are bound to confidentiality, can access them. This includes encrypted transmission, strict access restrictions, and protection of the whistleblower's identity under the confidentiality requirement of Section 8 HinSchG.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more