Handler confidentiality duty
The handler confidentiality duty requires everyone involved in processing a report to keep the identity of whistleblowers, accused persons and third parties, as well as all report contents, strictly confidential.
The handler confidentiality duty is a core element of the confidentiality requirement enshrined in the German Whistleblower Protection Act (HinSchG). It binds every person authorised to receive, assess or further process reports, or brought in for a specific case – in particular the individuals charged with operating the internal reporting office, their deputies and supporting specialists. Protection extends not only to the identity of the reporting person, but also to the identity of the persons named in a report as the subject of allegations, to other third parties mentioned, and to all content that could allow conclusions to be drawn about these individuals.
Under Section 8 HinSchG, this information may become known only to the persons responsible for receiving reports or taking follow-up measures, and to those supporting them within the scope of their responsibilities. The duty applies regardless of whether a report later proves to be justified, and generally continues to apply after the procedure has been concluded. Handlers must put technical and organisational safeguards in place so that unauthorised persons – including supervisors, management or IT staff – cannot access the confidential data; this includes, for example, access restrictions within the case management system and separate storage of documents.
The confidentiality duty is not absolute: Section 9 HinSchG sets out narrowly defined exceptions, such as breaching confidentiality – after prior notification of the reporting person – at the request of law enforcement authorities in criminal proceedings or in certain administrative procedures. Breaches of confidentiality may be subject to fines and can undermine the law's protective effect for the reporting person. A consistently observed handler confidentiality duty is therefore the precondition for employees to trust the reporting system and for reprisals to be effectively prevented.
Legal Basis
Sections 8 and 9 HinSchG (confidentiality requirement); Art. 16 EU Whistleblower Directive (EU) 2019/1937
Practical Example
A compliance officer appointed to run the internal reporting office receives a report about suspected bribery payments by a department head. The managing director asks her to disclose the whistleblower's name in order to "clarify things internally". The handler refers to her confidentiality duty under Section 8 HinSchG and discloses neither the whistleblower's identity nor any identifying details. She documents the request for information, carries out the follow-up measures independently, and uses role-based access rights in the case management system to ensure that only she and her deputy can view the case data.