Skip to main content
Sustainability / ESG

Taxonomy Alignment

Taxonomy alignment is the demonstrated conformity of an economic activity with all technical screening criteria of the EU Taxonomy and is the prerequisite for classifying that activity as environmentally sustainable.

Taxonomy alignment is the central yardstick of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (the EU Taxonomy). An economic activity is taxonomy-aligned only if it meets the technical screening criteria that apply to it. The first condition is taxonomy eligibility: the activity must be described in the Delegated Acts to the Taxonomy. Only once the criteria are fulfilled does eligibility turn into actual alignment.

Assessment follows three cumulative conditions set out in Art. 3 of the Taxonomy Regulation. First, the activity must make a substantial contribution to at least one of the six environmental objectives: climate change mitigation, climate change adaptation, water and marine resources, the circular economy, pollution prevention and control, and the protection of biodiversity and ecosystems. Second, it must do no significant harm (DNSH) to any of the remaining objectives. Third, it must comply with the minimum safeguards, which are based on the OECD Guidelines and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

For companies subject to reporting, taxonomy alignment must be quantified and disclosed in the management report. The disclosed figures are the shares of taxonomy-aligned turnover, capital expenditure (CapEx) and operating expenditure (OpEx). These obligations arise from Art. 8 of the Taxonomy Regulation together with Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 and are interlinked with the CSRD and the ESRS. The data is tagged in XHTML using the ESEF taxonomy and is subject to the assurance of the sustainability report.

Legal Basis

Art. 3 and Art. 8 Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (EU Taxonomy); Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 (climate); Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 (disclosure); CSRD (Directive (EU) 2022/2464)

Practical Example

A mid-sized heat pump manufacturer assesses, for its sustainability report, what share of revenue is taxonomy-aligned. The compliance lead maps production to activity 3.5 (manufacture of energy-efficiency equipment for buildings), demonstrates the substantial contribution to climate change mitigation against the technical thresholds, documents the DNSH assessment for the other five environmental objectives, and evidences compliance with the minimum safeguards through the human rights due diligence processes. As a result, she reports 62 percent of turnover and 78 percent of CapEx as taxonomy-aligned and discloses these figures in an assurance-ready management report.

FAQ

An activity is taxonomy-eligible if it is described in the Delegated Acts of the EU Taxonomy. It becomes taxonomy-aligned only when it additionally meets all technical screening criteria, the DNSH principle and the minimum safeguards. Eligibility is therefore the step that precedes alignment.
First, a substantial contribution to at least one of the six environmental objectives. Second, no significant harm to any of the remaining objectives (do no significant harm). Third, compliance with the minimum safeguards under Art. 3 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852.
Companies subject to reporting disclose the shares of taxonomy-aligned turnover, capital expenditure (CapEx) and operating expenditure (OpEx). The disclosure follows Art. 8 of the Taxonomy Regulation in the management report and is interlinked with CSRD reporting.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more