Skip to main content
Sustainability / ESG

Supply Chain Due Diligence

Supply chain due diligence is a company's obligation to identify, prevent, mitigate and transparently report on human-rights and environmental risks along its supply chain using a risk-based approach.

Supply chain due diligence obliges companies to systematically identify and address their actual and potential adverse impacts on human rights and the environment within their own operations, at direct suppliers and, where there are substantiated grounds, at indirect suppliers as well. Rather than a mere code of conduct, it is an ongoing, process-based approach modelled on internationally recognised standards, in particular the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.

At its core, due diligence follows a risk-based logic: measures must be appropriate and prioritised according to the nature and scale of the business, the company's ability to exert influence, and the severity and likelihood of the potential harm. The process typically comprises anchoring a policy statement, regular and event-driven risk analyses, preventive and remedial measures, the establishment of a grievance mechanism, and continuous effectiveness monitoring and documentation. It is an obligation of effort, not a guarantee of a violation-free supply chain.

In Germany, the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) specifies these requirements for large companies and is enforced by the Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control (BAFA). At the European level, the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) extends the approach across the entire chain of activities and links it to civil liability and climate transition plans. Due diligence is therefore closely interwoven with sustainability reporting under the CSRD and ESRS, which require disclosure of processes, risks and measures along the value chain.

Legal Basis

German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG), in particular Sections 3-10 LkSG; Directive (EU) 2024/1760 (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, CSDDD); UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises

Practical Example

The compliance officer of a machinery manufacturer conducts the annual LkSG risk analysis and finds indications of excessive working hours and inadequate occupational safety at a direct supplier in a high-risk country. She prioritises the risk based on severity and the company's leverage, agrees a binding remediation plan with deadlines, contractually anchors training and audit dates, and verifies implementation through the grievance mechanism and follow-up audits. She documents every step, the measures taken and their effectiveness in an audit-proof manner for the BAFA report and CSRD reporting.

FAQ

The LkSG primarily applies to large companies based in Germany and focuses, on a graduated basis, on their own operations as well as direct and, on an event-driven basis, indirect suppliers. The European CSDDD broadens the obligations to the entire chain of activities, adds civil liability and requires a climate transition plan. Once the CSDDD is transposed nationally, the LkSG will be adapted accordingly.
No. Due diligence is an obligation of effort, not of result. Companies must take appropriate, risk-based and prioritised measures geared to severity, likelihood and their own ability to influence. What matters is that the processes are effectively designed, implemented and documented.
The CSRD and the ESRS require disclosures on due diligence processes, material risks and impacts, and measures along the value chain. A functioning due diligence system therefore also provides the data basis for sustainability reporting. Both frameworks reinforce one another and should be managed in an integrated way.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more