Skip to main content
Sustainability / ESG

UN Sustainable Development Goals

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the 17 goals of the UN 2030 Agenda that link environmental, social and economic development and serve companies as a voluntary reference framework for strategy and sustainability reporting.

The Sustainable Development Goals were adopted by the UN General Assembly on 25 September 2015 in Resolution A/RES/70/1, "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development". They comprise 17 goals – from "No Poverty" (SDG 1) through "Decent Work and Economic Growth" (SDG 8) and "Climate Action" (SDG 13) to "Partnerships for the Goals" (SDG 17) – underpinned by 169 targets and a global indicator framework of roughly 230 indicators. The 2030 Agenda addresses states first and foremost: the SDGs are not a body of rules that binds companies directly, but political objectives with a horizon of 2030. The resolution nevertheless explicitly calls on the private sector to contribute, an appeal picked up in Germany by the National Sustainable Development Strategy, which translates the SDGs into national indicators.

In corporate reporting the SDGs mainly serve as a structuring and communication framework. The common approach is an SDG mapping: material topics, targets, metrics and measures are assigned to those goals the company actually influences through its own operations and its value chain. Methodological guardrails come from the SDG Compass by GRI, the UN Global Compact and WBCSD with its five steps (understanding, defining priorities, setting goals, integrating, reporting and communicating) and from the GRI Standards, which encourage linking material topics to the SDGs. For participants in the UN Global Compact, the annual Communication on Progress is the usual place to disclose the SDG connection. The CSRD and the ESRS, by contrast, do not require SDG reporting: they organise disclosures around double materiality, topical standards and defined datapoints. References to the SDGs belong there at most as supplementary entity-specific information or within the description of strategy and business model – a narrative layer alongside the ESRS disclosures, never a substitute for them.

The main practical risk is "SDG washing": printing colourful SDG icons without a robust link to targets, metrics and outcomes. Good practice is to focus on a small number of goals for which measurable targets and outcome indicators exist, to characterise the contribution honestly (a contribution towards a goal rather than achieving it) and to name negative impacts as well, such as emissions, water consumption or working conditions in the supply chain. Consumer protection law backs this up: Directive (EU) 2024/825 on empowering consumers for the green transition prohibits generic, unsubstantiated environmental claims; it had to be transposed by 27 March 2026 and applies from 27 September 2026. Independently of this, the European reporting framework remains in motion: the European Commission's Omnibus package reworked the scope and timeline of the CSRD and led to a revised, streamlined set of ESRS, while individual deadlines and detailed requirements are still moving through the legislative process and should be checked against the current status before a reporting roadmap is fixed.

Legal Basis

UN Resolution A/RES/70/1 of 25 Sept 2015 (2030 Agenda: 17 SDGs, 169 targets); indirectly: GRI 1–3 (2021), UN Global Compact Communication on Progress, German Sustainable Development Strategy; delimitation: CSRD (Directive (EU) 2022/2464) and ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772) do not require SDG disclosures; Directive (EU) 2024/825 (environmental claims)

Practical Example

A mechanical engineering company with 900 employees wants to add an SDG section to its first CSRD-compliant sustainability statement because key customers keep asking for one. The sustainability officer starts not with the icons but with the materiality assessment already completed: of the identified impacts, risks and opportunities, four goals remain where the company has genuine leverage – SDG 7, SDG 8, SDG 12 and SDG 13. She assigns each goal an existing metric with a target value, for example Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions from ESRS E1 for SDG 13 and the share of audited suppliers for SDG 8. SDG 5 and SDG 4, which the marketing draft had backed up with a photo from a career day, are dropped for lack of any metric or target. Two trade-offs go into the report as well, stated plainly: the higher energy demand of the new hardening shop and the dependence on upstream suppliers in regions of high water stress. The mapping table is labelled as entity-specific information and kept clearly separate from the assured ESRS datapoints, so the auditor can delimit the scope of assurance without ambiguity.

FAQ

No. The 2030 Agenda is a political resolution of the United Nations addressed to states, not directly to companies. Neither the CSRD nor the ESRS require SDG reporting. Publishing SDG references is voluntary – but once published, the claims must be substantiated under general fair-trading and consumer protection law.
The ESRS structure reporting through double materiality, topical standards and defined datapoints, whereas the SDGs offer 17 global goals. Sound practice is to use ESRS metrics as evidence for the SDG mapping, for instance Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions from ESRS E1 for SDG 13. The SDG table remains supplementary entity-specific information and replaces no ESRS datapoint.
Focus on the few goals that follow from your materiality assessment and back each one with a target, a metric and a base year. Describe contributions rather than achievement, and name the negative impacts of your own business model too. Generic, unsubstantiated environmental claims are prohibited under Directive (EU) 2024/825, which applies from 27 September 2026.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more