Skip to main content
Sustainability / ESG

ESRS S3 Affected Communities

ESRS S3 is the social standard of CSRD reporting that discloses a company's material impacts, risks and opportunities affecting local communities across its entire value chain.

ESRS S3 „Affected Communities" is one of the four social European Sustainability Reporting Standards that are mandatory under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The standard requires companies to disclose how their operations and value chain – including upstream and downstream business relationships – affect local communities. It captures both actual and potential, positive and negative impacts on people affected by the company's activities or business relationships, such as residents living near production sites, indigenous peoples or communities located at raw-material sources.

In terms of content, ESRS S3 organises the reportable topics into three sub-categories: the communities' economic, social and cultural rights (e.g. adequate housing, food security, access to water and sanitation, and impacts on land rights), their civil and political rights (e.g. freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, the protection of human-rights defenders) and the rights of indigenous peoples (in particular the right to free, prior and informed consent, FPIC). Companies must describe their policies, their processes for engaging affected communities, their remediation mechanisms and grievance channels, as well as concrete actions and targets.

Whether and to what extent ESRS S3 must be reported follows from the double materiality assessment: only material impacts, risks and opportunities trigger a reporting obligation for the relevant data points. ESRS S3 is closely linked to the human-rights due-diligence obligations under the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) and the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The disclosure creates transparency about how a company respects land rights, avoids displacement, limits environmental impacts on livelihoods, and identifies, prevents and remedies adverse human-rights consequences for affected communities.

Legal Basis

ESRS S3 (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772) in conjunction with Art. 19a, 29a CSRD/Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU; complemented by the German LkSG and the CSDDD (Directive (EU) 2024/1760)

Practical Example

A mechanical-engineering company sources cobalt and lithium for battery components from mining regions where land-use conflicts occur. In the double materiality assessment, the compliance officer classifies the impacts on land rights and on the water supply of local communities as material. For the ESRS S3 disclosure she documents the human-rights policy, describes the stakeholder dialogue with representatives of the affected villages, sets up a grievance mechanism and defines measurable targets to reduce adverse impacts – including the processes used to remedy any violations identified.

FAQ

Affected communities are groups of people who live or work in a geographic area and may be impacted by a company's activities or business relationships. This includes residents near sites, communities at raw-material sources and indigenous peoples across the entire value chain.
ESRS S3 addresses economic, social and cultural rights (such as land rights, water and housing), civil and political rights, and the particular rights of indigenous peoples, including the principle of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC).
Both aim to identify and mitigate human-rights risks in the value chain. ESRS S3 requires transparent disclosure of impacts on communities, while the LkSG and CSDDD establish concrete due-diligence, prevention and remediation duties. The underlying processes can largely be shared.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more