Skip to main content
Sustainability / ESG

ESG Rating

An ESG rating is the assessment of a company's sustainability performance across the dimensions environment, social and governance, carried out by an external rating agency on the basis of standardised criteria.

An ESG rating captures a company's sustainability performance across the three dimensions environmental, social and governance. Specialised rating agencies such as MSCI, Sustainalytics, ISS ESG or S&P Global evaluate publicly available information, questionnaires and company disclosures and condense them into an assessment, for example a letter grade (e.g. AAA to CCC) or a risk score. The aim is to make a company's exposure to material sustainability risks and the quality of its risk management comparable.

Unlike the legally mandated sustainability reporting under the CSRD and ESRS, ESG ratings are a private-sector product with no uniform methodology. Agencies weight industries, topics and data points differently, which is why one and the same company can receive widely diverging results from different providers (so-called "rating divergence"). Investors, banks and business partners nevertheless use ratings extensively, for example for portfolio steering, in the context of disclosure obligations under the SFDR, or as part of supplier assessments and lending conditions.

At EU level the market is being regulated for the first time: the ESG Rating Regulation (EU) 2024/3005 subjects providers of ESG ratings to authorisation and supervision by ESMA from mid-2026 and requires transparency about methods, data sources and conflicts of interest. For reporting companies the practical consequence is that a robust, audited CSRD/ESRS data foundation increasingly forms the basis of external ratings. Those who collect, document and manage their data points cleanly improve not only the quality of their reporting but also their position in the relevant ESG ratings.

Legal Basis

Regulation (EU) 2024/3005 on the transparency and integrity of ESG rating activities; supplemented by SFDR (Regulation (EU) 2019/2088), CSRD (Directive (EU) 2022/2464) and ESRS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772)

Practical Example

The sustainability officer of a mechanical engineering company notices that the company receives a "B" from one rating agency and an "AA" from another. She analyses the methodology reports of both providers and realises that the lower rating is mainly due to missing data on Scope 3 emissions and supply chain due diligence. She then links the ESRS data points collected for CSRD reporting with the agencies' questionnaires, closes the data gaps and provides supporting evidence. In the following year the rating improves noticeably, which secures the company more favourable terms on a sustainability-linked loan.

FAQ

CSRD reporting is a legal disclosure obligation based on standardised ESRS requirements. An ESG rating, by contrast, is the voluntary, external assessment of this and other information by private rating agencies. The reporting provides the data foundation, while the rating condenses it into a comparative grade.
There is no uniform methodology. Agencies weight topics, industries and data points differently and partly use different data sources. As a result, the same company can receive markedly diverging assessments depending on the provider. This so-called rating divergence makes comparability difficult.
Yes. Under EU Regulation 2024/3005, providers of ESG ratings will be subject to authorisation and supervision by ESMA from 2026. They must disclose their methods, data sources and conflicts of interest transparently. The aim is greater reliability and integrity in the ESG rating market.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more