Skip to main content
Data Protection / GDPR

Accuracy

Accuracy is the GDPR principle requiring personal data to be correct and, where necessary, kept up to date; inaccurate data must be erased or rectified without delay.

Accuracy is one of the core processing principles of the GDPR and is set out in Article 5(1)(d) GDPR. Under this principle, personal data must be accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date. Controllers must take every reasonable step to ensure that personal data which is inaccurate, having regard to the purposes for which it is processed, is erased or rectified without delay. The principle protects data subjects from adverse decisions being made on the basis of incorrect or outdated information.

The benchmark for accuracy is always the specific purpose of the processing: how current and precise the data must be depends on what it is used for. A one-off shipping address is held to a lower standard than creditworthiness or health data that drive ongoing decisions. The controller must therefore assess, on a risk-based basis, the intervals and methods used to validate, reconcile and update data sets. The obligation is both an obligation of result and of effort: it requires the outcome of 'accurate data' as well as evidence of appropriate organisational and technical measures taken to achieve it.

Accuracy is closely linked to the right to rectification under Article 16 GDPR, which gives the data subject an enforceable claim to have inaccurate data corrected and incomplete data completed. Added to this are the notification duty towards recipients under Article 19 GDPR and the overarching accountability principle under Article 5(2) GDPR, under which the controller must be able to demonstrate compliance with the principle. Infringements may be sanctioned under Article 83(5) GDPR with fines of up to EUR 20 million or 4 percent of total worldwide annual turnover, which is why accuracy should be a fixed component of any data protection governance.

Legal Basis

Art. 5(1)(d) GDPR (in conjunction with Art. 16, Art. 19 and Art. 5(2) GDPR)

Practical Example

A data protection coordinator at an insurance company finds that customer addresses merged from several legacy systems are partly outdated, causing contract documents to be sent to the wrong recipients. She establishes an annual data quality review, integrates an address check against a reference register and sets up a self-service portal through which policyholders can correct their own master data. Incoming rectification requests are handled within one month and affected recipients are informed under Article 19 GDPR; the measures are documented in the record of processing activities to satisfy the accountability principle.

FAQ

It requires controllers to keep personal data accurate and, where necessary, up to date. The standard depends on the purpose of the processing. Inaccurate data must be rectified or erased without delay.
Accuracy is the controller's objective duty under Article 5(1)(d) GDPR. The right to rectification under Article 16 GDPR is the data subject's subjective counterpart. Both aim at correct and complete data sets.
Proven measures include regular data quality reviews, automated plausibility and duplicate checks, and self-service corrections for data subjects. Rectification requests should be handled within the deadline and recipients informed under Article 19 GDPR. Everything should be documented for the accountability principle.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more