Skip to main content
Data Protection / GDPR

Processor

A processor is a natural or legal person that processes personal data solely on the documented instructions and for the purposes of a controller, without deciding on the purposes and means of the processing itself.

A processor (Art. 4(8) GDPR) handles personal data on behalf of a controller, for example as a cloud provider, payroll service, newsletter dispatcher or external data centre. The decisive criterion is the absence of decision-making power over the purposes and means of the processing: whoever determines the 'why' and 'how' is the controller, while a party that merely executes on instructions is a processor. If, however, a service provider makes essential decisions of its own, it may become a controller in its own right or a joint controller.

The processor's obligations follow primarily from Articles 28 to 33 GDPR. It may act only on documented instructions from the controller, must ensure the confidentiality of the persons involved in the processing, and must implement appropriate technical and organisational measures under Art. 32 GDPR. Further sub-processors may be engaged only with authorisation, and the obligations must be passed on contractually. The processor assists the controller with data subject requests, breach notifications and data protection impact assessments, maintains its own record of processing activities under Art. 30(2) GDPR, and deletes or returns the data once the engagement ends.

The legal basis for this relationship is a data processing agreement (DPA) under Art. 28(3) GDPR containing the mandatory minimum content set out there. In terms of liability, the processor is not a mere tool: under Art. 82(2) GDPR it is liable to data subjects for damage where it has failed to comply with its specific processor obligations or has acted contrary to a lawful instruction. Infringements may additionally attract administrative fines under Art. 83 GDPR. If a processor exceeds its instructions and determines the purposes and means itself, it is considered a controller in respect of that processing under Art. 28(10) GDPR and bears full controller responsibility.

Legal Basis

Art. 4(8), Art. 28–33 and Art. 82(2) GDPR

Practical Example

An online retailer engages a cloud provider to host its shop system, including the customer database. Before any production data flows, the data protection officer concludes a DPA under Art. 28(3) GDPR, reviews the technical and organisational measures documented in the contract and authorises the sub-processors used (for example, the data centre). When a security incident later occurs at the host, the host notifies the retailer without undue delay so that the retailer can meet the 72-hour deadline under Art. 33 GDPR. Because the host acts solely on the retailer's instructions, the retailer remains the controller and the host is liable only for breaches of its own processor obligations.

FAQ

The controller decides on the purposes and means of the processing, whereas the processor acts exclusively on instructions on the controller's behalf. A party that makes essential decisions about the data of its own is no longer a processor but a controller in its own right or a joint controller.
Yes. Under Art. 82(2) GDPR the processor is liable where it has failed to comply with its specific obligations or has acted contrary to a lawful instruction from the controller. Administrative fines under Art. 83 GDPR may apply in addition.
Yes, as soon as a service provider processes personal data on instructions, a contract under Art. 28(3) GDPR with the prescribed minimum content is mandatory. Without it the processing is unlawful and may be sanctioned with a fine.

How preeco supports you

Learn how our software supports you with this topic.

Learn more